LLM Systems Architecture 2025
Technical overview of modern LLM system architectures, focusing on inference, fine-tuning, and system integration.
When deploying LLMs in production, teams face a critical decision: build custom MLOps infrastructure or leverage managed service providers. Building in-house offers maximum control and potential cost savings at scale but requires significant DevOps expertise and ongoing maintenance. Managed services provide faster time-to-market and reduced operational complexity but may have higher per-token costs and vendor lock-in concerns. This guide covers core architectural components relevant to both approaches, helping teams make informed decisions based on their scale, expertise, and requirements.
System Components
The foundation of any LLM system requires careful consideration of these core architectural elements, each playing a crucial role in system performance and reliability.
Component | Implementation | Purpose |
---|---|---|
Serving | Disaggregated | Resource optimization |
Caching | Semantic-based | Reduce redundant compute |
Processing | Batch operations | GPU utilization |
Deployment | Serverless | Dynamic scaling |
Advanced Inference Optimizations
Modern LLM deployments leverage several key optimization techniques to balance throughput, latency, and resource utilization. These approaches can significantly impact both performance and operational costs.
Technique | Description | Trade-offs |
---|---|---|
Semantic Caching | Stores semantically similar queries/responses | Memory vs compute cost, cache invalidation complexity |
Speculative Decoding | Predicts multiple tokens simultaneously | Higher GPU memory usage, potential wasted compute |
KV Cache Management | Efficient context window handling | Memory vs performance balance |
Continuous Batching | Dynamic request combining | Latency vs throughput optimization |
Model Management
Effective model management becomes critical as organizations scale their LLM operations. This encompasses everything from initial training to deployment and monitoring.
Feature | Implementation | Consideration |
---|---|---|
Fine-tuning | LoRA-based | Memory efficiency |
Variants | Version control | Deployment management |
Inference | Batched serving | Resource allocation |
Monitoring | Usage metrics | Cost optimization |
Enterprise Requirements
Enterprise deployments demand additional considerations beyond basic functionality. These requirements ensure production readiness and compliance with organizational standards.
Category | Features | Purpose |
---|---|---|
Security | SOC2, HIPAA | Compliance |
Network | VPC/VPN | Isolation |
Scaling | Auto-scaling | Resource management |
Monitoring | Analytics | Performance tracking |
Implementation Notes
When moving from development to production, teams often encounter several common challenges. Understanding these challenges and their solutions helps prevent operational issues.
Challenge | Solution | Common Pitfalls |
---|---|---|
Context Length | Token chunking | Exceeding GPU memory, losing context between chunks |
Cost Control | Request batching, caching | Redundant API calls, inefficient prompt design |
Error Handling | Graceful fallbacks | Missing retry logic, timeout handling |
Rate Limits | Queue management | Insufficient backoff, missing circuit breakers |
Resource Planning (MLOps)
For teams building their own MLOps infrastructure, resource planning is crucial. These metrics provide baseline guidance for infrastructure provisioning.
Resource | Typical Usage | Optimization |
---|---|---|
GPU VRAM | 8-80GB per model | Load balancing, model quantization |
Network | 50-500ms latency | Request batching, edge caching |
Storage | 10-100GB per model | Lazy loading, pruning |
Memory | 16-64GB RAM | Streaming responses, garbage collection |
Development Tools
A robust tooling ecosystem supports successful LLM deployments. These tools help teams monitor, optimize, and maintain their systems effectively.
Category | Examples | Use Case |
---|---|---|
Monitoring | Prometheus, Grafana | Performance tracking |
Profiling | PyTorch Profiler, nsight | Optimization |
Testing | LLM Unit Tests | Output validation |
Deployment | Docker, K8s | Orchestration |
The architecture supports multiple modalities (text, audio, image) and integrates with external tools through standardized APIs. Implementation focuses on maintainable, scalable systems rather than raw performance metrics.
New: Claude 3.7 Released!
Claude 3.7 Sonnet, the first hybrid reasoning model, combines quick responses and deep reflection capabilities. With extended thinking mode and improved coding abilities, it represents a significant advancement in AI technology.Learn how to access Claude 3.7 and Claude Code →
Subscribe to AI Spectrum
Stay updated with weekly AI News and Insights delivered to your inbox